TIGed

Switch headers Switch to TIGweb.org

Are you an TIG Member?
Click here to switch to TIGweb.org

HomeHomeExpress YourselfPanoramaThe 2005 G8 Summit Echoed the Need for Participatory Development Approaches in Africa
Panorama
a TakingITGlobal online publication
Search



(Advanced Search)

Panorama Home
Issue Archive
Current Issue
Next Issue
Featured Writer
TIG Magazine
Writings
Opinion
Interview
Short Story
Poetry
Experiences
My Content
Edit
Submit
Guidelines




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
The 2005 G8 Summit Echoed the Need for Participatory Development Approaches in Africa Printable Version PRINTABLE VERSION
by Antony Felix O. Simbowo, Kenya Mar 20, 2006
Poverty   Opinions
 1 2   Next page »

  

The 2005 G8 Summit Echoed the Need for Participatory Development Approaches in Africa The 2005 G8 Summit took place in Gleneagles, Scotland with the main agenda to lower the debt Africa owes the developed world as well as double ‘aid’ to the African nations. However, the main arguments which are really the source of the indebtedness and poverty were not clearly addressed.

The fact is these same developed nations for years on end have callously abetted the culture of ‘lutocracy’ in Africa through what former Ghanaian President Jerry Rawlings in a speech delivered recently in Witwatersrand University, South Africa called ‘the three monkeys of hear no evil, see no evil, and speak no evil.’

Although the whole Tony Blair-driven idea of canceling debt owed by African nations is timely, much more still needs to be done on the continent in as far as accountability in the use of the concessional loans (tagged aid) is concerned. It is indeed a socio-economic exercise in futility for poor African nations to be given these loans which later end up in private pockets and secret bank accounts in the same developed world from where the funds arose.

Many corrupt and gluttonous African and Third World leaders have opened up secret bank accounts in the developed world against which the ‘keeper’ developed countries have taken little or no concrete action, and these leaders get to enjoy these monies, which they looted from the public coffers of the developing world, with adamant impunity.

With Africa’s total debt standing at a staggering US $300 billion, most African and Third World citizens, born and unborn, have been appallingly yoked to the squalor of poverty and debt-paying as their governments borrow funds year-in and year-out with no hope of ever completing repayment of the same. The issue of debt cancellation is noble, yet will be negatively tainted by the forecasted doubling of debt, which under the same previous terms of lending will not have fully solved the Third World socio-economic malaise. Without the concrete revision of terms of lending and global trade, the African nations will continue to be mired in the vicious cycle of hopelessness and debt. This has occurred even as the issue of unfair trade practices is still being given a wide berth by several of the developed world global trade stakeholders, and the African and Third World farmer languishes under the weight of low prices for their agricultural produce at the world trade arena.

It therefore amounts to a fallacy and an irony that many developed nations come around and lampoon African nations for poor leadership and ‘bad governance,’ yet their surreptitious cash vaults are stashed to the brim with apparently stolen funds. It is widely alleged in Africa that these are the same monies, which they stone-facedly scoop, then give back to the African and Third World countries as ‘aid’ assistance. While developed world protest-diplomacy is apt, especially in cases of official corruption and bizarre and premeditated government ineptitude, it should be backed by action – not mere words of condemnation.

In Kenya alone, each person born and unborn owes US $400 in debt to the international lenders for which the time of completion of repayment is unknown. The United States’ aid to Africa is a paltry 0.16% of its GDP, of which $1.5 billion goes to economic cooperation and emoluments for consultants and $1 billion to food aid. According to USAID, the organization responsible for overseas US ‘aid’ administration through its head Andrew Natsios, the total overseas development assistance from the USA in 2004 was US $ 91.4 billion of which only US $ 3.2 billion went to Africa.

The frequent forcing of policies down the socio-economic throats of African and other developing-world nations has not only posed a threat to their future development aspirations, but also disintegrated their economic fabric as most of the said policies are clearly never in their growth interests.

One example is the much perpetrated Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs), which were done at a time when many African nations such as Kenya were experiencing hard economic times with skyrocketing unemployment levels. As such, a participatory approach should be given to the World Bank and IMF policies being implemented in the Third World to ensure that they benefit the common African and Third World citizen. In this line, such economically oriented and participatory approaches to development as the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) as sponsored by the World Bank Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) should be widely publicized and even taken to the grassroots village level in African countries to ensure that each and every common man and woman has been given a voice in their preparation and implementation.

Despite being rich in fresh water sources, mineral resources as well as reeling in the abundance of fertile soils, many countries in Africa still continue to unashamedly seek humanitarian food assistance year-in and year-out. Others are still experiencing energy deficits yet have huge deposits of radioactive energy sources, as well as abundant and untapped solar and wind opportunities. There should thus be a drive towards the exploitation of these sources of energy. This would not only help in the conservation of forests but also in the preservation of catchment areas. It will also provide enough energy for an industrial revolution currently stifled by broken and incoherent policies.





 1 2   Next page »   


Tags

You must be logged in to add tags.

Writer Profile
Antony Felix O. Simbowo


TakingITGlobal has never been more apt than it is now in providing a forum for expression. This is because the dynamic world has undeveloped challenges that pose a great problem to the growth and daily life of any youth in the global society. What with the incessant wars, poverty, HIV/AIDS, pornography, racism and several other vices creeping into the society in a culture best objectified as vicious gradualism.
Here is where writing comes in handy and the TakingITGlobal literati, glitterati and pundits alike have provided a vital conduit through which these vices, positive and negative dynamism can be expressed.
I am saddened for example, when a promising youth is reduced to a hopeless parasite by drugs. More saddening is when I see the mercilessness, the hopelessness, the dereliction, the lack of love that many children, youth and people are subjected to due to wars, poverty, pornography and such as other negativities which silently and slowly kill the spirit and will within humans! Having gone through such experiences myself, I pray that God gives me the massive ability to be able to help these people to the best of my ability with His guidance, provision and protection. I have often wondered whether the expression "do unto others what you would have them do unto you" is being subjected to relativity. These are the problems which need highlighting and what better forum is there than TakingITGlobal.
I am privileged to be part of this ideologically vimmed and gustoed community.
Comments
You must be a TakingITGlobal member to post a comment. Sign up for free or login.