What Micheletti tries to say here is that Zelaya is against the ruling of the Supreme Court by trying to hold a referendum to change the constitution about the presidency, and therefore he is against the law. However a country needs, not only law, but also democracy. Without democracy, law can only be a set of restrictions placed on the people. Manuel Zelaya, a democratically elected leader, represents the people’s will in Honduras. Someone may say that that Manuel Zelaya wanting to change the Constitution is because of his despicable desire to stay longer on his office. In other words, he only cares about his own political power despite the court’s ruling. However, Zelaya was holding a referendum, which means he wanted to determine the people’s will.
It doesn’t matter what Zelaya’s intention was as long as the people were in support of him. If Zelaya wants to hold onto his power longer than one term and most importantly, his people want him to stay longer, then why not? Laws are made by the people, and so they can be and should be changed according to the will of the majority of the people. That’s what majority rule means. That’s what democracy means. That’s what popular sovereignty means—the idea that governments serve the people and only act according to the people’s will.
Micheletti and his allies also blamed Zelaya’s socialist policies in which Zelaya gained popularity by giving handouts to the poor. It is incontrovertible that his polices to redistribute the wealth are socialistic or leftist, but so what? There is nothing wrong with being socialist.
What do you have to say against being socialist? That it may end up in a Communist dictatorship like Czechoslovakia and Poland were? That it may cause violence and result in another “Tiananmen Square Massacre”? Come on; don’t hold on to such stereotyping views. Socialism doesn’t always equal Communism or dictatorship. Countries like Czechoslovakia, Poland, and China used the wrong socialistic policies at wrong time. Furthermore, when a country has a widening gap between the rich and the poor, socialism is needed and should be used.
According to http://mapup.com/namerica/honduras.html, “Honduras is one of the poorest and least developed countries in Latin America. Industrial development has been limited and, historically, the economy has been dependent on exports of coffee and bananas. The currency has been undergoing a steady and controlled devaluation of roughly 6% per year for the last several years.” In this situation, wealth needs to be redistributed among the people. The poor have to get their voice heard and the country should be led by a leader who can stand on the side of the poor since there are more poor than rich. Manuel Zelaya is the one who can bring them hope and democracy.
Coups d’état are detrimental and should by all means be avoided because they can cause turmoil, uprising, and even violence. A democratic country should try to solve its problems democratically, and if the government is still republican, they should let Manuel Zelaya return to his office, or at least back to his own country.
« return.