The advertising frenzy for socially conscious travel is creating a dangerous race to the bottom. These days travel companies compete to see who can design the most interesting local, hands-on, ‘development’ experience. If done incorrectly, this results in the exploitation of poor communities’ suffering to satisfy the vanity of wealthy Westerners.
The appeal of spending a week offering volunteer services in exchange for a lifetime of (self-defined) martyrdom appeals to the hero in all of us. However, for this goal to be realized we need for people poorer and worse off than ourselves to exist, and we need to be able to provide them with superior circumstances. This reinforces a hierarchy of superior over subordinate, allowing Us to condescend to aiding Them and enabling us to feel good about ourselves, while simultaneously making the travel companies a few bucks.
This, however, is the worst case scenario. While some travel companies seek out the poorest of the poor in order to provide Westerners with the chance to be a saviour for a day (at the right price, of course), many organizations engage in socially conscious travel for the actual social benefits. The problem, of course, is sorting the good guys from the bad.
When assessing the merits of a travel company that claims to pursue social justice you must consider a few things. By asking yourself the following questions and learning about an organization before travelling with them, you can ensure that you are engaging with an organization which is legit:
- Who founded the organization? Was it founded by a religious group, a local group of people or an international organization? It is arguable that secular, grassroots organizations are more likely to be dedicated to development goals, and have a better understanding of the needs of people, than are foreign-based organizations.
- What is the make-up of the company? Does it have a large percentage of locals working in the organization, or is it primarily foreigners? Locals are likely better at understanding the needs of a community, and thus have a higher likelihood of success at development projects.
- What is the content of their programs? Are their programs culturally relevant and adapted to local circumstances? How much local involvement and participation went into shaping program goals and expectations?
- What is their long-term track record? Do they remain engaged with the community over significant periods of time or is it a one-shot deal? Short-term engagement can indicate a lack of commitment to sustaining change and improving livelihoods.
- Have their programs been evaluated for effectiveness? Have people said whether or not they benefited from the programs? If not, it may be that the organization is more interested in advertising socially-conscious travel than in effecting real change on the ground.
- From where does their funding come? To where does the majority of their funding go? Annual reports should be transparent and companies should be clearly accountable for the projects they engage in.
- How are their programs implemented? Are they hand-out programs or do they involve skills-training and livelihood-building so that people can become self-sustaining rather than dependent? Oftentimes short-term construction or maintenance projects are the simplest ways to incorporate social justice into travel tours. However, if there is no training of locals to maintain the sites once the travellers have left, the positive results of the work are negligible.
Thus, not all socially conscious travel tours are created equally. Having experienced less-than-successful overseas development projects, I am discouraged to know that others may face similar disappointments. This is especially the case if they don’t undertake their pre-departure research carefully. In an attempt to enhance the volunteer travel experiences of others, I offer this final, somewhat controversial lesson which I painstakingly learnt through personal experience, but now solidly believe in: you cannot do successful community service if you pity the people you’re trying to help. Pitying people entails envisioning yourself at a vantage point that allows you to classify their situation as below your own and therefore pitiable. This automatically inhibits your ability to truly connect to them as equals.
While it is often natural to feel sorry for people in difficult situations, it is important to remember to look for signs of agency in these people. Look for the positive ways in which they are trying to improve their own environment. Look at the rebellious actions they do in their own lives to reject their circumstances. This will allow you to see them with respect and admiration.
This means that when you travel you should expect to learn something. Westerners often think they can help others, which is true, but it is also important to realize that others can help Westerners to learn new things. Travel, particularly volunteer travel, should be undertaken with the mindset that “I am going to learn something. I am going to help them, but they are also going to help me gain a new understanding of the world.”
Setting yourself at an equal level to another person’s by assuming you are both going to benefit allows you to travel and work with others in a cooperative, rather than condescending, manner. With this mindset and careful research into the tour operator you’re travelling with, you can ensure a positive, socially-conscious travel experience which will benefit you and the communities you’re working with.
Photograph, Lives transformed, by Yama Enayat.
« return.